Registered user login:

Secretive saviours

Mark Seddon

Published 05 June 2008

The rivers of cash from big business that Tony Blair wanted to replace trade union money have dried to a trickle

Four weeks and counting. Or rather, not counting very much at all, as the Labour Party has run out of money. It has a month to find £7.45m to pay off the wealthy donors recruited by "Lord Cashpoint", aka Lord Levy, or face becoming insolvent. News that the GMB union has decided in an emergency meeting to indemnify its two members on Labour's ruling National Executive Committee (NEC), Mary Turner and Debbie Coulter, has encouraged other unions, such as the mighty Unite, to consider doing the same. Otherwise one of its NEC representatives, Jack Dromey, the Labour Party treasurer and husband of Harriet Harman, risks being made bankrupt. The uncomfortable truth is that under the party's constitution, members of Labour's NEC are "jointly and severally" responsible for the party's debt - now, according to the Electoral Commission website, around £24m with interest - and that includes the Prime Minister, too.

As the rivers of cash from big business that Tony Blair wanted to replace trade union money have dried to a trickle, the large unions have moved to fill at least some of the gap. But there is a problem. The unions simply don't have enough cash to plug the gaping hole; and, more to the point, there is plenty of evidence that their members are increasingly reluctant to allow their leaders to do so.

Unreported at the time, the T&G section of Unite narrowly missed carrying a vote for disaffiliation from the Labour Party last summer. The flight of votes from Labour in the months that followed, and inevitably of trade unionists away from Labour as well, makes it much harder for union general secretaries to bang the drum for the party's coffers. Labour now has few assets and a membership somewhere well below the figure of 200,000. In many parts of the country it has ceased to operate altogether.

The party's impending insolvency is beginning to concentrate minds, not least those of a group of previously Labour-friendly businessmen, who can spot a bargain when they see one. The New Statesman has learned that the unnamed, secretive group - whose members have track records in helping turn round left-leaning institutions in the past - is considering approaching hedge funds with a view to buying out the Labour Party, or rather the remaining individual members, who would be offered shares instead. "Turning the members into shareholders could offer the same opportunities as the demutualisation of the building societies," says one who is involved.

A business plan has yet to be drawn up, as the group will wait until it hears what the NEC intends to do. But the same source adds: "We have been watching how Silvio Berlusconi created Forza Italia in parallel to his business interests, and we believe that our idea offers a fascinating adaptation to British conditions."

Quite how those who are courting this rapidly declining asset stand to benefit is unclear. Another businessman who is part of the "Syndicate", as he puts it, is less guarded. If new Labour became a "limited liability party", it might be possible, he says - not entirely jokingly - to "sell non-core policies, from a customer perspective, as three-to five-year options on implementation in office". These could include policy sales to the nuclear industry or to the green lobby. "This," he points out, "could help ensure that national policies achieve the highest returns. And that could only benefit the shareholders - or, as they used to be known, the party members."

Gordon Brown's preferred candidate for general secretary, the City financier David Pitt-Watson, found his keenness for the job evaporating after he was allowed to see Labour's books and was advised that he, too, could be personally liable for some of the debt. Time is short and Labour may not have the luxury of waiting for a business buyout. In the meantime, the party is looking for two "High-Value Donor Fundraisers". Top of their list for this dynamic duo must surely be the two extremely wealthy individuals who landed the party in this predicament in the first place: Lord Levy and Tony Blair.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

rodmc
07 June 2008 at 10:43

So they cannot even manage their own finances... hmmm, this does not look good for the economy.

I suppose one option could also be the sale and lease-back of MP's via some sort of 50-year PFI deal. The investors could then sell on the "bonds" in each MP on the open market at a vastly inflated price, while also charging the party a nice huge fee. They could all be sold for around 100,000 then leased back over 50 years at 15,000 per year (enough to cover the increasing cost of capital while also making a profit). You know it makes sense...

OneUnderGod
10 June 2008 at 02:50

SERVING big buisness [not the unionists] seems to be reaping the dividend that usually follows when buisness sets the adgenda [ie the running down of asset viability in favour of the quick return for the stake holder.

In short selling the longterm viability for short term gains ,is your typical anti unionist big buisness remedy ,what a joke the non labour serving labour party has become .

Even buying up the dead corpse wont change the mindset of those serving the buisness as usual adgenda ,

the unionists got no return, in fact were used to serve special intrests and shareholder bonus and multinational stock holder gain , labourite bosses are not even concerned with long term service but only its own shortterm adjenda serving to its elite tory masters they sold out to.

The chicken has come home to roost [see what happens when big buisness has its own way ], when foreign owned colluders makes their own rules , and govt serves its own short term adjenda by elitist self intrests subverting the party of the people into serving the adjenda of the elite.

It would be funny if it wernt treason ,and now that you have betrayed the people you still insist doing nothing to make ammends ?

Why even bother [do you really deserve your peoples [tax payer paid generouse pensions and perks or a jail cell ,

but dont fret on it the tories allways look after their own ,for you never intended to serve the people now [or then ] did you?

You destroyed any credability yet still insist doing nothing is better than trying to fix the evil you have served

[see how your masters run to save you [the labour brand is soiled goods [hold the members who did the coluded treasons in power to account] ,you know it makes euro's not sense

gnuneo
09 November 2008 at 01:36

"considering approaching hedge funds with a view to buying out the Labour Party, or rather the remaining individual members, who would be offered shares instead. "Turning the members into shareholders could offer the same opportunities as the demutualisation of the building societies," says one who is involved."

this IS a joke right? Right??

http://theyesmen.org/hijinks/wharton

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?