Registered user login:

Right to strike over low pay

Dave Prentis

Published 25 June 2008

Since 2004 local government workers have had below inflation awards. Their vote in favour of strike action shows you can push people only so far, argues Unison boss Dave Prentis. Gordon Brown should sit up and take notice

Next month (July) 600,000 UNISON local government members will take strike action over a 2.45 per cent below inflation pay offer. This is not a decision they take lightly - our members are there to serve the public - but they are facing an unjust pay policy and feel pushed into a corner.

Labour inherited a recruitment and retention crisis in our public services. Morale was low and services were suffering. A lot has been achieved, but we cannot afford to undo this good work. We all want quality public services, but they do not come cheap and workers deserve fair pay and good conditions.

Councils are already struggling to compete for staff with other public and private sector employers – even in low wage areas. If they fall further behind, local authorities will not have the staff to deliver services – let alone work towards making improvements and delivering change.

Local government workers continue to be the poor relations of the public sector. Since 2004 they have had below inflation awards, but the vote in favour of strike action this week underlines the message that you can push people only so far before they say enough is enough.

It is crunch time for our members who provide the every-day services that people rely on - teaching assistants, social workers, care workers, librarians, dinner ladies, lollipop ladies, leisure and parks and garden staff as well as refuse collectors and street cleaners. It cannot be right that 250,000 staff still earn less than £6.50 an hour and they have said clearly they cannot afford to accept another below inflation offer.

Three quarters of council workers are women, who, far from fuelling today’s inflation, are victims of the rising prices of everyday essentials. They are being hit hard by the cost of putting food on the table, spiraling gas and electricity bills and the recent hikes in fuel.

There is not an economist in the country who agrees with Government claims that public sector pay fuels inflation. If the government is serious about tackling inflation they need look no further than the boardroom bonanzas and big city bonuses. They should tackle the corporate greed of the energy
companies BP and Shell making £7 billion profit in just three months.

In the meantime local government workers, who have to use their cars for work, are effectively subsidising their employers – they are left out of pocket because fuel prices have overtaken their mileage rates.

It is a disgrace that tens of thousands of public sector workers cannot afford to live in the communities they serve. I said at our conference last week that we reject Brown’s pay policy. We didn’t elect a Labour
government to watch its core supporters suffer this way. We don’t want Gordon to feel our pain we want him to stand up and heal it.

Dave Prentis is general secretary of Unison

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

18 comments from readers

antileft
26 June 2008 at 04:31

Dave, Im sorry, but I fail to understand what the problem is. If I was paid badly, I would quit and get something better. If I was paid badly but I couldn't get anything better because of a lack of skills, then I would accept the situation, grateful that I was getting the best deal available for me. If you can get more money elsewhere, why don't you quit? If you can't, you're getting a good deal- why are you complaining?

mumjules
26 June 2008 at 13:40

Hi - I know I am stating the obvious here but how do we afford to strike for 2 days? Many of us are single parents on a very tight budget and as much as we agree with the strike and want to support it, financially we just cannot manage without 2 days pay? Jules

marilyn
28 June 2008 at 09:49

Hi.

I work as a Nursery nurse and I am expected to take the class whilst the teacher is out of the classroom one afternoon a week to do her preparation and planning. If a teaching assistant covers the other classes she gets double pay, however I get no more as I was told a nursery nurse earns enough money anyway!

cartwright12
01 July 2008 at 16:22

lance.1.7.08 can i just say that mr brown is just one big joke the quicker he is out of power the better for the brittish people. its ok for him how he has got in power i will never know. i would love to know wot salariey a year he gets.

HLTA
01 July 2008 at 18:03

It does not matter how much Mr Brown gets.. he gets more in allowances/pension and a "pay off" when he is out of office anyway, What does he and others care about us, the working puplic. And I enjoy my work (teaching assistant) so want to keep doing what I do but get paid for it. The cost of living rate they use for our rise is based on the low rate not the true higher one.

Unison Steward
02 July 2008 at 09:31

Shop Steward - Social Care Chesterfield !

Response to anyone who feels that you "Cant Afford to Strike" - so can you afford not to ? How much longer can you except pay cuts on top of pay cuts - in real terms! Last year we accepted 2.5% 1.8% below real inflation. This year , currently we are being offered a 1.85% pay cut. Many council workers especially in social care use their own vehicles for council buisness and are running them at a loss of 20p per mile - We are subsidising the Local goverment how much more would people like to accept - perhaps you could give up maternity allowence, statutory sick pay Annual leave - Were does it stop - Have some backbone and stop being a Thatcherite product of the 80s and a "sod you Jack im alright person. The basic principle of any trade union is "Unity" That is our strenghth. This is why we should all stand together and show our employers that we mean buisness.

Oh and a message for "Clever Cloggs" Many of us actually enjoy our jobs thats why we work in public service however, that does not mean that we should work for a pittence and cower down like our comrades in the private sector!!

marylowe
02 July 2008 at 10:12

I dont think it is very fair that union staff have to pay allot of money to be in the union, loose 2 day pay and non members get the same deal as members.

do you think no members should still cover the work?? what does other member think?

Rubicon
02 July 2008 at 11:04

I am currently woring as a Science Technician in a secondary school, and the school has introduced a new system involving "co-tutors" which means support staff such as myself, the cleaners, teaching assistants et al must share a tutor group each morning. Some of us are not trained for this nor insured and NONE of us have this extra duty reflected in our salary. Due to other circumstaces technicians are also now currently having to deal with some of the terrible corridor behavior. We are the leasted trained having to work with the most difficult situations and we're getting paid to be technicians only, and even then it's just not enough for the type of things we must do here!

Rubicon
02 July 2008 at 11:05

*least trained, excuse my grammar!

dave y
02 July 2008 at 13:14

A reply to shop steward, chesterfield.

You state "Thatcherite product and sod you Jack" then go on to mention Unity. Only 30% of ballot papers were returned, out of the ballot papers returned 55% voted in favour of strike. I cannot see how a 30% return can constitute a vote. Where was the "unity" from the other 70%. I enjoy my job in the public sector and of course would like more pay. I don't agree striking is the right policy, the 2 days I am on strike will have no impact on services, all repairs and maintenance I supervise will still be carried out and I will return to 2 days of backlogged computer system and paperwork.

A good example to think about is this: Binmen go on strike and bins are not emptied for 2 days. At weekend the bin men are paid overtime to clear the back log!

UNISON member
02 July 2008 at 13:40

It is not a good example of Trade Unionism when members are faced with a devide in Unions. I think UNISON has the right attitude to defending peoples pay by giving members the democratic right to vote for industrial action. GMB gave their members a recomendation to accept the pay offer (cut). Now UNISON members are being goaded by GMB members by statements of 'UNISON fight for our pay rise and lose 2 days pay and if you achieve a better offer we will benifit also'. This is not the attitude of a true Trade Union and they should be held to task.

A. MacWood
02 July 2008 at 14:09

Low Paid School Meals worker Derbyshire

School meals workers in Derbyshire are the lowest paid public employees, we earn 5.77p per hour pro rata. With the lose of the 10p tax bracket, the increase in fuel costs, food costs, higher interest rates, inflation increase in council tax, have I missed anything, we can't afford to live. Jamie Oliver was all for promoting better school meals and getting the Government to invest more money in nutritious meals but what of the workers?, Jamie,did nothing for them and the government has done less..

School meals workers in Derbyshire are committed to giving the children the best . But on the 16/17 july they'll all be on strike because its time for fair play and fair PAY

popster
03 July 2008 at 16:08

When you enter into a contract of employment, you know how much the pay is going to be before you accept it. In the public sector we are fortunate enough to get cost of living increases every year. This does not happen in the private sector. When times are harder, there are no pay increases in the private sector.

Those who think we should strike because we have such a rough deal in the public sector should try comparing their pay against people doing similar work in the private sector. In my area of work we get about 40% more than private sector equivalents, and far, far better benefits.

Wolfie Smith
06 July 2008 at 20:32

Mr Prentis, the Unions need to be looking more at the “TRUST - Equality and institutionalized Bullying & Harassment issues within the Public Sector.

Taxpayers would be Alarmed to Know of the Fraudulent and Corrupt misuse of public money - for example: During the July 16th & 17th Strikes;

Nationally many Headteachers are being allowed to close Schools at the Taxpayers expense - with out question from the LEA’s?

Nationally many Headteachers and Teachers will receive full payment of their wages - even if they make ‘NO’ attempt to attend their Schools – (Their place of Employment.)

http://www.direct.gov.uk. (Guidelines state)

Headteachers and Teachers “have the right to cross a picket line if they do not support the industrial action being taken. If they are unable to cross a picket line, they need to convince their employer that they did everything reasonably possible to do so.

If your employer considers they didn't make every effort, they may decide that they have joined the industrial action”, This means the The Taxpayers should not have to pay the Headteachers or Teachers wages for not working.

The Claiming of Wages for Hours Not worked amounts to Fraudulent and/or corrupt activity & a gross misuse of public / Taxpayers money. (This would not be allowed for any manual Public sector employee – Equality? - Public Trust )

maggiemin
08 July 2008 at 11:09

I am very concerned for the lower paid sector in our union. As a socaial worker I am very busy but consider myself adequately paid. Clearly from messages and from p[eople I know, dinner staff, care staff (the few left in unions) are appallingly low-paid. I wish we could find a way of striking to improve the pay ratio; the lower paid need a much bigger rise than the rest of us. I voted "no" in the ballot as I consider this strike unlikley to achieve a good outcome at this moment in time, but I will go on strike as I believe in being a union member, whatever personally I may think.

Barnsey
09 July 2008 at 10:32

What about the appalling conditions our children are expected to learn in & teachers are expected to work in. When are these issue going to be fairly represented by members. I fully support our providers of education but striking repeatedly over pay & never the equally important issues of decent working/learning conditions for all seems grossly unfair. Decent pay & DECENT CONDITIONS FOR ALL OF OUR CHILDREN TO LEARN IN!

TimTom
10 July 2008 at 00:07

As a Unison member Im disgusted with the actions of those who purport to represent me. Unison pay £800k per month in political levies into an almost bankrupt Labour Party. The threat of withdrawal of the funding would be enough to bring the Government to the table out of fiscal necessity. So why haven't we threatened them with this? Could it be anything to do with our glorious leaders being afraid to ruin their own future political ambitions?? Strike?? You mst be joking. Take some of the risk yourselves and i might be interested.

EnzoF1
16 July 2008 at 19:16

All of the people at the school my wife has recently started working at say the will not be striking as the head teacher has claimed to have found evidence that they can't as it's a Church of England school.

I have never heard anything like this before, has anyone else?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?